The Fact of Disagreement Between the Sayings of the Commentators: An Analytical and Critical Study of the Linguistic Issues through S?rat al-Baqarah

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Umar Farooq Lecturer, Department of Islamic Thought and Culture
  • Dr. Fazli Dayan Associate Professor of Law
  • Dr. Mian Muhammad Sheraz Associate Professor of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54262/irjis.05.01.a2

Keywords:

Lexical, Disagreement, Qur’ān exegeses, Sūrah al-Baqarah, Islamic Law

Abstract

Notably, lexicon knowledge is essential for interpreting the holy Qur’?n. Thus, for this purpose, the Qur’?n exegeses are required to have sufficient noesis of lexical cognition; as an imperative tool for understanding the real meaning(s). Otherwise, the matter may confuse the interpreters and disarray the readers. So, it is a prerequisite for the interpreters to cognize every aspect of lexical interpretation while parsing the Qur’?nic verses. Nevertheless, considering the different lexical rules, the commentators have stated diverse connotations of the same verse or the word of the holy Qur’?n. This kind of deliberation indicates a difference of opinion among the commentators in determining the intention and denotation of various words. Therefore, this article presents the nature of these differences and diverse approaches in the light of S?rah al-Baqarah.

Author Biographies

  • Dr. Muhammad Umar Farooq, Lecturer, Department of Islamic Thought and Culture

    National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Dr. Fazli Dayan, Associate Professor of Law

    Faculty of Law, Grand Asian University Sialkot (GAUS), Punjab, Pakistan

  • Dr. Mian Muhammad Sheraz, Associate Professor of Law

    Faculty of Law, Grand Asian University Sialkot (GAUS), Punjab, Pakistan

Published

30-06-2023

How to Cite

The Fact of Disagreement Between the Sayings of the Commentators: An Analytical and Critical Study of the Linguistic Issues through S?rat al-Baqarah. (2023). International Research Journal on Islamic Studies (IRJIS), 5(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.54262/irjis.05.01.a2